1. Field Station describes itself as
an action lab investigating the future of work, the reach of technology, and the shape of society. Based in North East England, working globally. We study digital sovereignty and build civic tech, in the open.
Here’s a piece by its two founders, Tom Watson & Doug Belshaw, Decisions Have No Autopilot: AI doesn’t replace organisational judgement — it amplifies whatever decision-making culture already exists https://notes.fieldstation.xyz/essay/decisions-have-no-autopilot/
At just before half past two in the morning on 1 June 2009, three pilots with more than 20,000 hours of combined flying experience were at the controls of Air France Flight 447, cruising over the Atlantic on autopilot. When ice crystals blocked the plane’s speed sensors and the autopilot disconnected, the aircraft asked its pilots to do the one thing they had stopped practising: fly it themselves. They disagreed about what the instruments meant, corrected against each other, and ran out of altitude before they ran out of confusion. The automation hadn’t failed. The judgement underneath it had gone soft, and nobody noticed until it was needed. Organisations are doing something similar with AI, at lower stakes and much greater speed.
2. Ruben Hassid is a BIG fan of Claude. The latest post on his blog, How to AI, is 27 Claude tips after 1,800 hours https://ruben.substack.com/p/1800-hours-of-claude
You loaded 40 files into a (Claude) Project, and now every answer is a remix of your own documents. Claude answers FROM your files instead of thinking. That’s why your post all sounds the same. Project is awesome if you want to write a contract or standard procedures. But it’s not as good for creative work. The rule: use Projects for repeated tasks with fixed material (client reports, weekly formats). Use a normal, empty chat every time you want a new idea.
It’s not obvious that Ruben’s on the Claude payroll, but I might well be being naïve!
3. I thought I’d mentioned the HELE (History of English Language Education) Studies Society in this blog before, but I can find no evidence of my having done so – remiss of me! A recent HELE initiative is a webinar series, ongoing, that has so far looked at English education in missionary schools in 19th–20th century China, ELT textbooks in the Soviet Sixties, the history of English textbooks in Italy, and soft power and standardized testing in the Middle East. The series was opened with a discussion between two of the prime movers in HELE, Amol Padwad & Richard Smith https://youtu.be/62AboYBOiVA Here’s all the other talks in the series https://www.youtube.com/@HELESociety
4. The July/August issue of EL Gazette, which has a focus on AI, is out https://elgazette.com/elg_archive/ELG2607/mobile/ You’ll need to create a free account if you haven’t already got one, but PDF below just this once!
[file x 1]
5. And, finally and more challengingly for this last item than usual, courtesy of OLDaily, On Exercising Epistemic Agency by Mona Simion https://www.mona-simion.com/_files/ugd/a31fb2_67539ed4bcd6414fac7905d2e2398c88.pdf PDF below.
Scepticism about epistemic agency is widely spread. Agency is about making our own decisions in an importantly autonomous fashion. We can’t form beliefs at will, however, so the epistemic is simply not the proper locus of agency.
Or so the sceptic thought goes. In contrast, optimists about epistemic agency point out that the sceptic is making a mistake in thinking that agency requires a level of control that eludes belief formation. Agency, they argue, simply requires the capacity to act for reasons. Mutatis mutandis, the thought goes, epistemic agency is cheap: insofar as your belief formation is evidence responsive, you’ve got the capacity to act for epistemic reasons. You’re fine.
This paper is an exercise in optimism …