This will be the last ‘Free Resources’ message until Tuesday 28th July, by which time (Cross fingers crossed) we will have installed a new boiler in Boba’s Zagreb flat, not (Cross fingers still crossed) had to fish Mateo out of a canal in Venice, and made more trips than I can count (on my uncrossed fingers) by ferry to and from the island of Cres. See you in four weeks!
1. From Andy Brock’s blog, Re Education, a guest piece by Sharon Tao, Founder and Director of Level The Field, What Happened to Girls’ Education? The quiet erosion of a global priority https://abrock.substack.com/p/re-education-issue-32-what-happened
The History / Herstory
A decade ago, girls’ education sat at the centre of international development. It was difficult to attend a major education conference, donor meeting or global summit without hearing commitments to girls’ learning. Governments competed to demonstrate leadership. New funding streams emerged. Large-scale programmes were launched. Champions spoke confidently about transforming the lives of millions of girls. Today, the mood is very different. At a time when nearly 133 million girls remain out of school and millions more face harmful gender norms that limit their learning, support for girls’ education is receding. Whilst this is often explained by shrinking aid budgets, funding tells only part of the story.
Here’s Level The Field’s mission statement:
Why we focus on marginalised girls
Throughout the world, groups of people are marginalised due to poverty, rurality, caste, disability or displacement, amongst others. These marginalised groups often have a very limited share of power, respect, resource, participation and safety within their contexts and societies. Within these marginalised groups, any privileges that remain are rarely distributed equally amongst men and women, and boys and girls. This is due to unequal gender norms, which disadvantage girls even further. Level The Field aims to address this situation so that marginalised girls can realise their full potential. This is not meant to advantage girls to the detriment of boys. Rather, the focus on marginalised girls is an effort to correct for generations of unequal treatment, rather than create it. In the end, when girls and boys have a level playing field – no matter what their background – everyone will benefit. The multiplier effect that comes with gender equality means that families will be better off, people will be healthier, there will be less violence and more security, and economies will develop. We think this is a goal well worth aiming for.
2. A gift article from The Atlantic – hope I’m not giving you too many! – by David Brooks, The People Who Will Thrive in the AI Age: what will differentiate people is not how smart they are but their relationship to mental effort https://tinyurl.com/7pkbyta6
Remember when AI was going to take away our jobs and leave humans with nothing to do? So far, that doesn’t seem to be happening. Researchers from ActivTrak analyzed the digital activity of more than 10,000 workers and found that when people adopted AI, their work life became more intense, not less. The time that these early adopters spent on email, messaging, and chat apps more than doubled. Their use of business software rose by 94 percent. Researchers from UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business found that when using AI, workers started taking on tasks that they had previously outsourced, because activities such as coding and engineering became easier to do. They squeezed in work bursts in the evening, on weekends, in waiting rooms, and whenever else they had a spare moment and AI was handy. They also did a lot more multitasking, supervising a bunch of bots doing different things simultaneously.
3. On the same topic, here’s a good paper from The World Economic Forum, Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Entry-Level Work: A Framework for Safeguarding and Reinventing Early Career Pathways https://www.weforum.org/publications/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-entry-level-work-a-framework-for-safeguarding-and-reinventing-early-career-pathways/ PDFs below of both the full report and the executive summary only.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping work, and this is most visible at the entry level. Globally, more than one in three (37%) young workers are employed in occupations with medium to high exposure to AI-driven task change, including three in four young workers in Eastern Asia (75%) and two in three young workers in Northern America (69%) and Europe (63%). Sectors with the highest exposure include Financial Services, Information and Communication, Professional Services, Science and Education, whereas entry-level roles in sectors such as Agriculture, Construction and Food Services are comparatively less affected.
The World Economic Forum website has lots of good content but is almost too clever/interactive for its own good – for me at least! https://intelligence.weforum.org/ See what you think.
4. Yet more on the AI theme, a typically engaging video from Hannah Fry, Why AI Agents are either the best or worst thing we’ve ever built https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw
I built an AI agent. She opened a shop selling novelty mugs, emailed a journalist without being asked, and then leaked our passwords to a total stranger. AI agents don’t just answer questions – they act. They can browse the web, send emails, and spend your money. Anyone can build one. So my friend Brendan and I did. We gave it a bank card and a few weeks to show us what it could do. The mugs she designed can be bought here https://www.teepublic.com/user/cassandralabmugs Although frankly why you’d actually want one is beyond me.
No CassandraLab mugs in stock any more: they must have sold out!
5. And, finally and degenerately, Why did so many people want to see “Degenerate Art” in 1937? from Katja Hoyer, with a lengthy extract from John-Paul Stonard’s new book, ‘The Worst Exhibition in the World’ https://www.katjahoyer.uk/p/why-did-so-many-people-want-to-see
The Nazis were hoping that by viewing some of the 21,000 items they had seized, people would “gain harrowing impressions of Jewish cultural Bolshevism,” and leave “the exhibition with a feeling of gratitude towards the Führer, who had had these products of madness removed from the museums.” In an effort to give the impression of moral depravity, the authorities banned anyone under the age of eighteen from visiting. According to the Nazified press, the Weimar showing was a resounding success, with some 6,000 people visiting the State Museum in the first week alone. It’s impossible to know who attended and why …