1. Two from The Conversation to start with today:
First, a piece by Sam Wass from the University of East London, UK parents urged to curb fast‑paced screen content for small children – neuroscientist who advised government explains why https://theconversation.com/uk-parents-urged-to-curb-fast-paced-screen-content-for-small-children-neuroscientist-who-advised-government-explains-why-278732
One route works through comprehension. Slow pacing, clear speech, exaggerated expressions and simple narrative structure allow children to follow what is happening. Comprehension drives attention. The second route operates through attention capture. Rapid movement, abrupt edits and dynamic sound capture attention automatically. Even if we are trying not to pay attention to something, movement makes it hard to ignore. We think that we developed like this because, historically, motion signalled threat or opportunity. That reflex remains. Attention capture is immediate, involuntary and does not depend on comprehension. Much contemporary digital content leans heavily on this second mechanism. It is instantaneous, and it works on everybody.
Little Mateo’s current favourite programmes, Ms Rachel and Bluey, seem to pass the Wass test!
Second, a piece by Talar Moukhtarian from the University of Warwick, Waking at 3am every night? Here’s what may be going on https://theconversation.com/waking-at-3am-every-night-heres-what-may-be-going-on-278264
Waking during the night is actually a normal part of sleep. Most people wake briefly several times, but usually fall back asleep so quickly they do not remember it the next morning. It becomes more of a problem when those awakenings last longer, or start happening at the same time every night, leaving you less refreshed the next day.
Screen time only gets a mention in passing in the second piece, but maybe, once captured, one’s attention – whatever age you are – keeps you awake?
2. The Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties) is “a watchdog that safeguards the human rights of everyone in the European Union” https://www.liberties.eu/en . Here’s their report on the current state of affairs in the EU, The Liberties Rule of Law Report 2026 https://www.liberties.eu/f/wtaqoq PDF of the executive summary only – probably enough for most of us – below.
The lack of implementation of individual recommendations sets the pattern for the overall trajectory in each Member State. 10 countries remain locked in the ‘Stagnator’ category with no meaningful progress in either direction, namely the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Spain. Five ‘Dismantlers’, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Italy and Slovakia represent the most serious concern, as these countries are actively eroding rule of law institutions, with four of them showing no change from last year. Latvia stands alone as the only ‘Hard worker’. The six ‘Sliders’, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Malta and Sweden are particularly noteworthy given their historically strong democratic reputations, confirming that rule of law erosion is not confined to a small number of outliers.
Well done. Latvia!
3. From ELT Buzz (thank you!), What actually Holds My Classroom Together by Melinda Karshner is a piece explaining “what twenty years of teaching taught (her) about classroom management and why the best tool (she has) is being human” https://substack.com/home/post/p-192532417
So let me be clear, I have never had a perfectly managed classroom. My classroom is perfectly imperfect. I am absolutely not saying my classroom is behavior free and that I have somehow unlocked the magic key to successfully managing classroom behavior without fail. No. We are all human, we all have behaviors, on no planet would I claim to have a perfectly well managed, behavior free classroom… but, in 20 years I have learned a lot about what not to do, and about how to get it mostly right.
Slightly strange expression, ‘behavior free’: ‘bad’ behavio(u)r free is what Melinda means, I think.
4. Andy Brock’s latest piece on his blog, Re Education, The Velcro Approach to Scaling in Education, “looks at scaling in education: what it means, why so many global educators talk about it, and whether in the current resource-stretched world it’s still a relevant topic” https://abrock.substack.com/p/re-education-issue-30-the-velcro-f22
Q. [Andy]
Let’s kick off with a bit of history. I’m interested in the history of the development of education systems – how they “scaled”. If you could go back to, say, the history of education in Scotland, how did that go from being a handful of schools in the 15th Century to a school in every parish within 100 years? What were the processes and drivers that enabled that? So, let’s talk a bit about how you see the history of education development in those broad terms.
A. [Brad]
Sure, that’s a good place to start. I feel like there are four histories that come together when you think about contemporary scaling.
For the first history—education as a formal practice—we go all the way back to China 1,000 years ago.
Read on for the three other histories!
5. And, finally, a glimpse through the looking glass, Nasha Niva, a Belarusian news site https://nashaniva.com/en/